Glen Powell and the Manufacturing of Modern Movie Stardom
A Baudrillardian Analysis of Hyperreality in Hollywood's Star System
In the ever-shifting landscape of Hollywood stardom, a curious phenomenon has emerged: the ubiquitous presence of Glen Powell. His name dominates headlines, his image appears on magazine covers, and industry buzz surrounds his every move. Yet, for many, the question remains: Who is Glen Powell, and what are his on-screen accomplishments? This disconnect between Powell's media saturation and his relatively modest filmography presents a fascinating case study in the nature of modern celebrity. As we delve into the peculiar trajectory of Powell's career, we find ourselves confronting larger questions about the mechanics of fame, the power of industry hype, and the evolving definition of stardom in our hyper-mediated age.
In the hyperreality of Hollywood, Glen Powell has become a simulacrum of a movie star ⎻ a copy without an original. The industry's fervent promotion of Powell as the next big thing exemplifies what Jean Baudrillard might call the precession of simulacra, where the image precedes the reality.
At 35, Powell's actual filmography is modest: 54 acting credits over two decades, with only one leading role in a streaming-only release. Yet, the Hollywood machine has generated a buzz around him that far exceeds his tangible achievements.1 This disconnect between Powell's actual body of work and his perceived stardom is a perfect illustration of Baudrillard's concept of hyperreality ⎻ a condition where the distinction between reality and simulation breaks down.
Compare this to the early careers of Tom Cruise or Tom Hanks: by Powell's age, these actors had starred in numerous blockbusters and critically acclaimed films, working with industry legends and amassing real cultural capital. Their stardom was built on a foundation of memorable performances and box office success ⎻ a reality that preceded and justified their star image.
Powell's career, in contrast, seems to exist more in the realm of simulation than reality. His biggest exposure came from a supporting role in Top Gun: Maverick, a part he initially rejected. Yet, in interviews, Powell speaks as if he's already achieved A-list status. This self-perception aligns with Baudrillard's idea that in postmodern society, we increasingly engage with representations rather than with any underlying reality.
The industry's treatment of Powell reflects a desperate attempt to maintain the simulation of the traditional star system in an era where its reality is crumbling. Streaming platforms, social media influencers, and changing audience habits have challenged the very concept of movie stardom. In response, Hollywood seems to be creating a simulacrum of a rising star in Powell, hoping that the simulation will generate its own reality.
This manufactured stardom is a form of hyperreality where the signs of Powell's celebrity (magazine covers, interviews, industry buzz) have become more real than any actual star power he's demonstrated on screen. It's as if Hollywood is trying to create a map before the territory exists, to borrow Baudrillard's metaphor.
The pressure this puts on Powell is immense. He must now try to live up to an image that precedes his actual achievements ⎻ to become the star he's already proclaimed to be. This situation echoes Baudrillard's notion of the Gulf War ⎻ an event so mediated and simulated that its reality became questionable. Similarly, Powell's stardom exists primarily in the realm of media and industry hype, with little grounding in box office numbers or iconic performances.
In a recent interview with Matthew McConaughey, the contrast between simulation and reality becomes stark. McConaughey, a star who has navigated both the highs and lows of genuine Hollywood stardom, seems to be subtly guiding Powell, perhaps recognising the younger actor's entrapment in a simulation of success.
Powell's situation serves as a litmus test for the power of simulation in modern Hollywood. Can the industry still create stars through sheer force of promotion and media saturation? Or will audiences ⎼ increasingly savvy to the mechanics of celebrity manufacture ⎼ reject this hyperreal construction?
As Baudrillard might suggest, the very concept of authentic stardom may now be obsolete, replaced by an endless circulation of images and simulations. Powell's career trajectory will reveal whether the simulation of stardom can still generate the economic and cultural effects of the real thing in our postmodern mediascape.
In the end, Glen Powell's rising "stardom" is less about one actor's career and more about the industry's desperate attempt to maintain the simulacrum of the star system. As the lines between reality and hyperreality continue to blur, Powell's success or failure will be a telling indicator of whether traditional notions of movie stardom can survive in an age where the simulation has become more powerful than the reality it once represented.
Until next time,
NEW ARTICLES
Thank you for reading Hyperreality. Your support means everything to us.
There are entire Reddit discussions dedicated to this point